注冊
    閩南網 > 教育 > 外語 > 正文

    六級答案2017年12月英語六級真題及參考答案(卷二)

    來源:233 2017-12-18 16:30 http://www.iosapp77.com/

    Data sharing: an open mind on open date

      [ A] It is a movement building steady momentum: a call to make research data, software code and experimental methods publicly available and transparent. a spirit of openness is gaining acceptance in the science community, and is the only way, say advocates, to address a'crisis' incience whereby too few findings are successfully reproduced. furthermore, they say, it is the best way for researchers to gather the range of observations that are necessary to speed up discoveries or to identify large-scale trends.

      [B] the open-data shift poses a confusing problem for junior researchers. on the one hand,the drive to share is gathering official steam. since 2013, global scientific bodies have begun to back politics that support increased public access to reseach.on the other hand,scientists disagree about how much and when they should share date,and they debate whether sharing it is more likely to accelerate science and make it more robust, or to introduce vulnerabilities and problems.as more journals and make it more robust,or to introduce vulnerabilities and problems.as more journal and funders adopt data-sharing requirements, and as a growing number of enthusiasts call for more openness, junior researchers must find their place between adopters and those who continue to hold out, even as they strive to launch their own careers.

      [C] one key challenge facing young scientists is how to be open without becoming scientifically vulnerable. they must determine the risk of jeopardizing a job offer or a collaboration prosal from those who are wary of-or unfamiliar with -open science. and they must learn How to capitalize on the movement's benefits such as opportunities for more citations and a way to build a reputation without the need for conventional metrics, such as publication in high-impact journals.

      [D] some fields have embraced open data more than others. researchers in psychology, a field rocked by findings of irreproducibility in the past few years, have been especially vocal sup-porters of the drive for more-open science.A few psychology journals have created incentives to increase interest in repar open science. a few psychology journals have created incentives porters of the drive for me lucible science -for example, by affixing an",badge to articles that clearly state where data are available. according to social psychologist brian nose executive director of the center for open science, the average data-sharing rate for the journal Psychological science, which uses the badges, increased tenfold to 38% from 2013 to 2015.

      [E] funders, too, are increasingly adopting an open-data policy .several strongly ergement,and some require,a date-management plan that makes data available .The us national science foundation is among these, some philanthropic (慈善的) funders, including the bill Gates foundation in seattle, washington, and the wellcome trust in london, alopen data from their grant recipients.

      [F] but many young researchers, especially those who have not been mentored in open science .are uncertain about whether to share or to stay private.Graduate students and postdoes,who often are working on their lab head's grant may have no choice if their supervisor or another senior opposes sharing.

      [G] some fear that the potential impact of sharing is too high, especially at the early stages of a career." Everybody has a scary story about someone getting scooped(被搶先),” says new York university astronomer david hogg. those fears may be a factor in a lingering hesitation to share data even when publishing in journals that mandate it.

      [H] researchers at small labs or at institutions focused on teaching arguably have the most to lose when sharing hard-won data. ""with my institution and teaching load, i don't have postdocs and grad students", says terry mcglynn, a tropical biologist at california state university,Dominguez hills. "the stakes are higher to share data because it's a bigger fraction of hats happening in my lab.

      [I] researchers also point to the time sink that is involved in preparing data for others to view.Once the data and associated materials appear in a repository(存儲庫 ), answering questions and handling complaints can take many hours.

      [J] the time investment can present other problems. in some cases, says data scientist karthik Ram, it may be difficult for junior researchers to embrace openness when senior colleagues many of whom head selection and promotion teesht ridicule what they may view as misplaced energies. "i've heard this recently -that embracing the idea of open datad code makes traditional academics uncomfortable, "says ram. "the concem seems to be that open advocates don't spend their time being as productive as possible."

      [ K]an open-science stance can also add complexity to a collaboration. kate ratliff, who studies social attitudes at the university of florida, gainesville, says that it can seem as if there are two camps in a field-those who care about open science and those who don't . " there a new area to navigate-'are you cool with the fact that i'll want to make the data open?'-when talking with somebody about an interesting research idea, "she says.

      [L] despite complications and concerns, the upsides of sharing can be significant. for example,when information is uploaded to a repository, a digital object identifier(DOI)is assigned.

      Scientists can use a DOT to publish each step of the research life cycle, not just the final paper. In so doing, they can potentially get three citations- one each for the data and software.in addition to the paper itself. and although some say that citations for software or data have little currency in academia,they can have other benefits.

      [M] many advocates think that transparent data procedures with a date and time stamp will protect scientists from being scooped. "this is the sweet spot between sharing and getting credit for it. while discouraging plagiarism(剽竊). " says ivo grigorov, a project coordinator at the naional institute of aquatic resot

      Research secreta - in charlottenlund, denmark. hogg says that scooping is less of a problem than many think. "the two cases i'm familiar with didn't involve open data or code, "he says.

      [N] Open science also offers junior researchers the chance to level the palying field by gaining better access to crucial date. ross mounce, a postdoc studying evolutionary biology at the university of cambrige,UK, is a vocal champion of open science, partly because his fossil others' data. he says that more openness in science could help to discourage what some perceive as a commom practice of shutting out early-career scientists' requests for data.

      [O] communication also helps for those who worry about jeopardizing a collaboration, he says,Concems about open should be discussed at the outset of a study. "whenever you start a project with someone, you have to establish a clear understanding of expectations for who owns the data, at what point they go public and who can do what with them, he says.

      [p] in the end, sharing data, software and materials with colleagues can help an early -career researcher to gain recognition--a crucial component of success. "the thing you are searching for reputation" says titus brown,a genomics(基因組學) researcher at the university of Califomia, davis,."to get grants and jobs you have to be relevant and achieve some level of public recognition. anything you do that advances your presence- especially in a larger

      phere, outside the communities you know- is a net win."

      36. astronomer david hogg doesn't think scooping is as serious a problem as generally thought.

      37. some researchers are hesitant to make their data public for fear that others might publish something similar before them

      38. some psychology joumals have offered incentives to encourage authors to share their data.

      39. there is a growing demand in the science community that research data be open to the public.40. sharing data offers early-career researchers the chance to build a certain level of reputation

      41. data sharing enables scientists to publish each step of their research work, thus leading to more citations

      42. scientists hold different opinions about the extent and timing of data sharing

      43. potential problems related to data sharing should be made known to and discussed by all participants at the beginning of a joint research project

      44. sharing data and handling data-related issues can be time-consuming

      45. junior researehers may have no say when it comes to sharing data.

    相關閱讀:
    新聞 娛樂 福建 泉州 漳州 廈門
    猜你喜歡:
    熱門評論:
    頻道推薦
  1. 北京市教委:今年秋季學期起,在全市中小學
  2. 西安交大宣布本科擴招!
  3. 德陽中考總分多少分?2025年德陽市中考中招
  4. 新聞推薦
    @所有人 多項民生禮包加速落地快來查收 三峽大壩變形?專家:又有人在惡意炒作 北京新一波疫情為什么沒出現死亡病例? 戴口罩、一米線 疫情改變了哪些習慣? 呼倫貝爾現幻日奇觀 彩虹光帶環繞太陽
    視覺焦點
    石獅:秋風起,紫菜香 石獅:秋風起,紫菜香
    石獅環灣生態公園內粉黛亂子草盛放 石獅環灣生態公園內粉黛亂子草盛放
    精彩視頻
    醫解百科︱生氣,謹防甲狀腺結節找上你!(視頻)
    醫解百科︱生氣,謹防甲狀腺結節找上你!(視頻)
    春有約 花不誤 泉州開元寺櫻花盛開
    春有約 花不誤 泉州開元寺櫻花盛開
    專題推薦
    關注泉城養老服務 打造幸福老年生活
    關注泉城養老服務 打造幸福老年生活

    閩南網推出專題報道,以圖、文、視頻等形式,展現泉州在補齊養老事業短板,提升養老服

    新征程,再出發——聚焦2021年全國兩會
    2020福建高考招錄
     
    48小時點擊排行榜
    iPhone 16/iPhone 16e對比怎么選哪個好 3月14日今天92/95號汽油最新價格表 3月19 漳浦縣開展全民義務植樹活動 漳州市領導到漳浦調研指導文物普查工作 漳州長泰:育秧從“田”進“廠” 科技育 “剩余空間”如何變為“金角銀邊”?漳州 關于印發《人工智能生成合成內容標識辦法 四部門聯合發布《人工智能生成合成內容標
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品高清视亚洲一区二区| 免费精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 一边摸下面一别吃奶| 一级大片免费看| 一级毛片在线不卡直接观看| wtfpass欧美极品angelica| 麻豆麻豆必出精品入口| 特大巨黑吊aw在线播放| 扒开两腿中间缝流白浆在线看| 国产福利小视频在线| 免费污污视频在线观看| 久久国产劲暴∨内射新川| 91蝌蚪在线视频| 精品无码成人网站久久久久久| 最新国产精品好看的国产精品| 好日子在线观看视频大全免费| 国产成人十八黄网片| 亚洲精品午夜视频| 中文在线天堂资源www| 亚洲国产欧美国产综合一区| 亚洲熟妇色自偷自拍另类| 中文字幕日韩人妻不卡一区| 久久国产真实乱对白| 毛片免费视频观看| 怡红院成人在线| 国产一级理仑片日本| 久热中文字幕无码视频| 2022国内精品免费福利视频| 精品人妻系列无码人妻免费视频| 最近中文字幕免费高清mv| 国产精品福利久久| 亚洲精品资源在线| xxxx日本在线播放免费不卡| 精品无人区乱码麻豆1区2区| 投资6000能开一个sf吗| 国产亚洲欧美精品久久久| 亚洲乱码卡一卡二卡三| 99re热在线观看| 看AV免费毛片手机播放| 成人福利视频导航| 国产亚洲欧美精品久久久|