2017英語專業八級閱讀理解推理題解題思路及技巧
推理題是英語專業八級閱讀題型之一。所謂推理題,通常是作者根據文章內容進行推理,得出正確結論。很多考生反映對這類題型的掌握不好,下面新東方在線專八頻道為大家進行詳細的解析,供大家參考!
1.識別
當infer,learn,imply,conclude,suggest,indicate等出現在題干中時,可基本判定該題為推理題。
2.分類
根據推理題的不同情況,我們可以將之分為不同的種類:
?、偌毠澬酝评恚侯}干中包含有具體定位信息,此時它的做法和細節題類似,有時比細節題更簡單。
②段落性推理:題干中包含有具體段落號(從四個選項中尋找定位信息或原文??汲鲱}點)。
③全文性推理:題干中包含主體詞或無定位信息(從四個選擇中尋找定位信息,或遵循順序原則)。
3.解題原則
根據推理題的實際解體情況,我們在解題時應該堅持以下原則:
①主題大于細節,觀點大于論據;
?、谕评肀仨氂性恼摀?
③重點關注轉折
4.??汲鲱}點
推理題的實質:是一種同義改寫,推理通常為正反推理和歸納總結。英語專業八級閱讀中??嫉某鲱}點通常出現以下特征:
?、俣温涫啄┚洹⒅黝}句、觀點句;
?、谂c主題密切相關的細節;
?、坜D折的地方;
?、軓娬{或遞進關系的地方。
具體該如何操作,還是我們一起來看看例題吧。
29. We learn from the last two paragraphs that business-method patents_________.
[A] are immune to legal challenges.
[B] are often unnecessarily issued.
[C] lower the esteem for patent holders.
[D] increase the incidence of risks.
題干問我們從最后兩段可以推測出什么?首先,還是先定位。
?、躎he Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market. The Federal circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the court’s judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should “reconsider” its State Street Bank ruling.
?、軹he Federal Circuit’s action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example, the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for “inventions”that are obvious. The judges on the Federal circuit are “reacting to the anti-patent trend at the supreme court”,says Harold C. Wegner, a patent attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.
根據第五段第二句,去年四月,法官表示說很多顯而易見的發明被授予。言下之意就是說,經常授予了沒有必要的專利問題。選項A、C和D都不是正確答案,本題選C。選項A,專利問題不受法律影響。文中有提到法律質疑很可能會改變專利的未來。選項C屬于無中生有的選項,文中并未提出;選項D并非是增加風險的幾率,而是規避。